<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tenant off the hook: landlords beware security risk in extending commercial leases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cartercapner.com.au/blog/landlords-beware-security-risk-in-extending-commercial-leases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cartercapner.com.au/blog/landlords-beware-security-risk-in-extending-commercial-leases/</link>
	<description>The Carter Capner Law blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 04:08:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcarter</title>
		<link>http://www.cartercapner.com.au/blog/landlords-beware-security-risk-in-extending-commercial-leases/#comment-24581</link>
		<dc:creator>pcarter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 23:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cartercapner.com.au/blog/?p=1397#comment-24581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tim - you are correct - in the Ironbark case, the extensions weren&#039;t by option.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim &#8211; you are correct &#8211; in the Ironbark case, the extensions weren&#8217;t by option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim White</title>
		<link>http://www.cartercapner.com.au/blog/landlords-beware-security-risk-in-extending-commercial-leases/#comment-24272</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cartercapner.com.au/blog/?p=1397#comment-24272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the case of the &quot;tenant off the hook&quot; (CPT Custodian v Ironbark), were there any Option periods or were the extensions a &quot;variation&quot; of the 7 year term? If an Assignee exercises (and is granted) an Option I was of the understanding, ( before the above case), that the Assignor was automatically released from ongoing liability as at the start date of the Option term.Is this correct?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the case of the &#8220;tenant off the hook&#8221; (CPT Custodian v Ironbark), were there any Option periods or were the extensions a &#8220;variation&#8221; of the 7 year term? If an Assignee exercises (and is granted) an Option I was of the understanding, ( before the above case), that the Assignor was automatically released from ongoing liability as at the start date of the Option term.Is this correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
