What new traps for agents in PAMDA process after September?
After next month, PAMDA’s new chapter 11 will only allow termination on one ground – if a buyer proves they were not given a clear statement (a “direction drawing statement”) alerting them to the contract, the form 30C warning statement and the BCCM information sheet .
Termination rights will no longer automaticaly apply for failure to ensure the warning statement and the BCCM information sheet are attached to the contract at the time of signing and the time of return of the signed contract to the buyer.
Likewise there are no termination rights relating to the order in which documents are attached or presented.
Do you think PAMDA changes from 01/10/10 will save time & money?!
- Yes (67%)
- No (33%)
Here are the basics for you to follow:-
Warning statements
The new requirements scheduled to apply from 1 October will be:-
1) form 30C warning statement and BCCM 14 information sheet (if required) must be prepared if contract prepared by seller or seller’s agent. termination rights apply
2) form 30C warning statement must be in correct form ie contain specified information that is presented in substantially the same way as the in approved form. BCCM 14 information sheet (if required) must be in approved form. termination rights apply
3) form 30C warning statement and BCCM 14 (if required) must be “attached” securely when giving the contract to the prospective buyer for signing. offence provision only
4) no form 30C warning statement required where the buyer prepares the contract.
5) buyer must be given “direction drawing statement”: a clear statement drawing their attention to the contract, the form 30C warning statement and BCCM 14 information sheet (if required). termination rights apply
6) form 30C warning statement required if seller amends buyer-prepared contract and returns it as a counteroffer. offence provision only. Buyer must be given “direction drawing statement” in such circumstances. termination rights apply
7) no requirement for buyer to sign form 30C warning statement and BCCM 14 (if required) but if buyer signs it (or them if needed) before they sign contract and it (or they) is/are ‘atttached’, buyer can’t terminate as per 5 & 6. If more than buyer, only one need sign.
8) if the contract is sent to the buyer by e-mail, the warning statement and BCCM form 14 must be included in the same e-mail. offence provision only
9) if sending by fax, the documents must be sent in the same fax transmission or in more than one if sent at the same time.offence provision only
10) no new form 30C warning statement (or re-signing of the original) and no new “direction drawing statement ” required every time there is a counter-offer during negotiations e.g. over price or settlement date except:-
- if the parties change including if eg, a husband and wife or family company replace the husband as buyer;
- if the property description changes or (potentially) if nominated fixtures are added or deleted;
- potentially, if contract format is changed from a ‘form’ eg ADL or REIQ, to a ‘non-form’ format.
Termination rights apply to exceptions for failure to give “direction drawing statement”. Potential offence provision only regards absence of new warning statement or re-signing same.
11) form 30C warning statement and BCCM 14 information sheet (if applicable) must be attached to the eventual signed contract when it is returned to buyer. offence provision only
Termination period

Peter Carter - Conveyancing & Leasing Partner
If buyer proves attention was not drawn to warning statement (and has not signed it) buyer can terminate prior to settlement but only within 90 days following their receipt of the signed contract from the seller. The period runs from the date of the buyer’s (or their soliciror’s) receipt of a copy of the signed contract. If a contract was sitting in the buyer’s P.O. Box for a week, the cooling off period is extended by that period.
Cooling-off
The 5 business day cooling-off period runs from the date of the buyer’s (or solicitor’s) receipt of the signed contract but if received on a weekend or public holiday, from the next business day thereafter. It ends at 5 p.m. on the fifth business day.
If the buyer signs the contract after the seller (or initials to accept changes made by the seller), the buyer is taken to have received a copy of the contract when the buyer has both signed (or initialed changes) and communicated acceptance to the seller. In other cases, PAMDA does not specify when ‘receipt’ occurs. For this reason it is essential for sellers to have buyers sign a “Receipt Acknowledgement” specifying the date upon which they have received a copy of the signed contract.










I notice you have said that if the contract is sitting in the solicitors po box for 1 week then the calculation of the commencement of the cooling off period will be extended by that week. So it is literally when the contract is in the hands of the buyer or solicitor, rather than when it was deleivered. So if an argument later came about regarding calculation of the cooling off period, the seller’s argument could be that they express posted it and so it is assumed to have been received the next business day. However the buyers lawyer may not have checked the po box for 1 week. Can you direct me to any authority on this? I am a NSW lawyer and this is all new to me
Thanks Colleen for your kind words
I only just saw your response! not sure why… Best wishes to all for the Christmas period and for 2011!
Nice clear article on trips and traps for real estate agents handling these forms. Thanks.
John Highman
With the ever changing Legislation its good to see assistance offered that explains and communicates the changes with simplicity so that agents can get on with the job of selling Real Estate. Thanks Peter and Carter Capner Law
I agree with Stewart Fraser… someone who talks the talk … I nominate Stacey Holt. Then she can come back to us all and tell us in real estate speak what on earth it all means!
Great article, thanks!
I think like all agents I am confused they are changing the Legislation on a monthly basis so it seems, I believe that common sense must prevail with this Government, they don’t appear to know what they are doing, I don’t know about other agents but how much time do we have to keep up with this nonsense, it must end soon and someone with common sense needs to take them to task.
There will certainly be interesting times ahead on this one… I think our poor industry is just darn confused all round! Thanks for the article.
Yes – the 90 day period will run from the date the buyer’s solicitor recieves the contract.
The 5 business day cooling-off period runs from the date the buyer has both signed the contract and communicated his acceptance to the seller.
These changes only go part of the way to fix a flawed system. Queensland ministers seem very reluctant to accept responsibility for failings within their own departments (Health is a prime example). In this case how about we get someone who can work effectively with both agents and the legal profession to get a system that will protect the buyer from unethical agents and yet be easy to administer.
About time we had some changes to this mess, but until the legislators actually sit down with those of us actually selling and providing legal services nothing will improve by any great measure!!
When can we have a minister who is actually interested in fixing all this rubbish so that dodgy agents can be weeded out and the rest of us and those in the legal profession can work together to effect sales as opposed to stressing out over which bit of paper had a staple in it and went first… Sigh…
Thanks Peter, appreciate your efforts!!
Would the Cooling Off period commence if the signed contract was sent to the buyers solicitor (as opposed to the buyer)?
Really enjoy the e-newsletters by the way.
With kind regards
Melissa Thurgood